On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 02:55:07PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mark Martinec:
> > > WTF PDP?
> >
> > Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
>
> Confirmed (I referred him to the mailing list, and have no
> more information than what has already been posted).
Then perhaps the question is about expanding the state passed via
XFORWARD to include everything known to the receiving SMTP server,
including SASL login names, client cert fingerprints, ...
If so, this is unlikely to happen. A policy daemon on the input instance
can, if it so chooses, prepend a custom header to encode additional
desired "envelope" details, and this header can be parsed by downstream
filters.
One limitation is that prepending multiple headers in a single policy
call is not currently possible. A milter may be necessary for more complex
processing.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
