Those are nice links, but when I subscribed to this list, I did not see
that as a requirement or a stipulation on my confirmation e-mail nor are
those links pertaining to postfix.org listserves. Maybe when you see
something that is not right, you can give them the benefit of the doubt
and explain to them why this is wrong, instead of being condescending.
Also, apparently you saw the blue, so you were able to read the e-mail
properly. Now, do you think you can provide some insight to the
original question?
sgs.
mouss said the following on 10/13/2008 3:49 PM:
sgsweb a écrit :
Are you really trying to be this anal or were you born that way? What
part of my response did you not understand? I tried to be as specific
as I can with the response. What did you not understand? Were you
offended (or confused) by the two different colors?
Yes, but see below.
Please explain.
http://db.glug-bom.org/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List_Etiquettes
"No HTML Mail, Please ..."
http://www.ualberta.ca/~pletendr/list-net.html
"Send only plain ascii text to mailing lists. ..."
http://db.glug-bom.org/wiki/index.php/Mailing_List_Etiquettes
"No HTML Mail, Please"
http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html
"please use plain text."
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
"Be considerate of other subscribers on the mailing lists. ...
Many subscribers and developers read their mail on text-based mailers
..."
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/
"Never send your messages in HTML; use plain text instead..."
http://www.efn.no/html-bad.html
"why is html in e-mail a bad idea...."
