Jordi Espasa Clofent a écrit : > Hi all, > > I use RBLs as you can see: > > smtpd_client_restrictions = > permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, > reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
and I guess you check your logs to see that these DNSBLs really work ;-p someday, there will be a dnsbl of sites using dead dnsbls... please remove list.dsbl.org. google or search ethe archives for more infos. > > Moreover, I use anvil(8) with > > smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 100 > smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit = 20 > > My question is: > ¿Does work anvil(8) _before_ or _after_ the RBLs restrictions? anvil doesn't care about smtpd restrictions. > > Consider the next scenario: SMTP client sends to your Postfix a > message which > > * is included in some RBLs which you use > * overtake the number of recipient establish by > $smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit > > ¿Who will rejected the mail, RBLs restriction or anvil(8) restriction >
