Chad Whitacre wrote:
Wietse,
> Sorry, that is backwards.
>
> If you want to "correct" Postfix behavior, then you need to
> provide supporting documentation that Postfix is in error.
>
> So please point out the relevant sections of email related
> RFCs, otherwise I suggest that you refrain from posting
> "corrections".
We've got a misunderstanding. I accept your statement that FQDN means
something different in SMTP than DNS. I'm not trying to correct Postfix
behavior, I'm trying to find the best reference to add to Wikipedia's
article on FQDNs. If I'm not mistaken, 5321 2.3.5 is this reference
(and, coincidentally, it appears that 5321 is being published as we
speak). Yes?
chad
Yes, that looks like an appropriate link.
it's certainly a better reference than this wandering thread...
--
Noel Jones
