On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:51:48PM +0500, rihad wrote:
> Sure enough, but I'm speaking of a single snapshotted value through a
> single request ("transaction"). Besides its being more efficient,
> caching makes for more consistent results: you wouldn't want Postfix to
> first consider a delivery local (mydestination), only to suddenly change
> its opinion and consider it remote.
Actually, you would want it to route correctly, based on the state of
the world at the time message delivery is attempted.
Postfix is *not* monolothic, and message delivery is not instantaneous.
Messages may sit in queues long enough to see the routing topology or
domain address classes change. This is fine.
> I hope it wouldn't dump core in that case :)
s/funny/snide/
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
