On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:04:00PM +0200, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:53:08PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > Would it not be better to reject the mail? How do you that:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > should be
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > instead? Or are you looking to masquerade sub-domains, or something else
> > more sensible?
>
> Something like masquerading, but with a list of allowed domains.
masquerading *all* sender domains is unwise, there is no reason to expect
equivalent name-spaces in domains you do not own. A regexp canonical
table can do this, with canonical_classes restricted to "envelope_sender".
Your goals don't quite make sense yet, what real problem are you solving?
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
