On Tue, Apr 24 2018, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2018/04/24 10:35, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23 2018, Frederic Cambus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi ports@,
>> >
>> > Here is a new port: benchmarks/wrk
>> >
>> > I'm aware that we are not supposed to import ports using GH_TAGNAME, I
>> > opened an issue asking for a proper release tarball but I haven't got
>> > any feedback from upstream yet. I can host the tarball on distfiles.pl
>> > if that's preferred?
>>
>> I'd prefer this, yes, but no strong opinion.
>
> The downside of this is that portroach won't find it.
yep :-/
> It would be nice to have a way for MASTER_SITE_BACKUP to work with these
> so that distfiles can still be fetched,
Yeah. Existing builders aren't badly affected, since they already have
the tarball in ${DISTDIR}. It would be nice to find a solution that
works for everybody.
> but the only way I can see to do this
> without being a horrible hack would mean a major change to URL handling in
> bsd.port.mk/dpb.
:-]
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
