Landry Breuil <[email protected]> writes:

> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> knot is an alternative authoritative nameserver implementation.  A few
>> people seems interested in it.
>> 
>>   https://www.knot-dns.cz/
>> 
>> Here's a port, along with the required liburcu package
>> (http://urcu.so/).  I'm not sure about the portability of both packages,
>> so build reports on !(amd64|sparc64) would be welcome.
>> 
>> Used in a slave amd64 setup by Pierre Emeriaud, lightly tested by me
>> with the example.com.zone.
>
> Regarding liburcu, i'm not sure of the autohell handing .. isnt setting
> CONFIGURE_STYLE = automake autoconf doing what's needed instead of
> running autoreconf ? iirc this automagically sets BDEPs too while here.

"CONFIGURE_STYLE = automake autoconf" requires a do/pre-configure target
anyway, so I used to handle this with just autoreconf.  I could change
this of course but (IIRC) this idiom is already used in the tree.  Is it
harmful?

> As for knot itself, in PLIST i think ${RCDIR} is used instead of
> hardcoding /etc/rc.d.

Thanks, will fix it.

> That said, it builds fine on i386, and on powerpc it's still chewing
> zscanner.c ...

We could use --disable-fastparser on slow/memory-limited archs.

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to