On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 02:09:24PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:42:37PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > > > > Executive summary: delete the procmail port; the code is not safe and > > should not be used as a basis for any further work. > > It's still in ports. Has it not been deleted for a particular reason?
What's the rush to remove it? What Philip said? Well in this case you can remove 75% of the ports tree. Not that I care, I'm just saying... because we're not talking about some obscure thing no one uses. Also, IIRC some other ports depend on it. -- Antoine
