On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
> install
> support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
>
Ok with me. The backends are in and the same outcome is achieved, be it
with a little manual intervention.
This said, 0.6.24 works fine here for my use case (which only involves
> sftp). If you agree about the above points, this leads to this diff, to
> be committed when the python.port.mk issue is solved:
For me, when REVISION is removed, I get when I 'make plist' [create a new
plist] to do a diff against:
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/PKG-INFO
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/top_level.txt
which means it breaks when 'make package'. To fix this, I leave the
REVISION in and explicitly define the PKGNAME:
REVISION = 1
PKGNAME = ${DISTNAME}
Is it just me or is Jim's email address broken? Maintainer needs to be
looked at in some way possibly.
On 1 September 2014 05:48, Giovanni Bechis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ok for me, maybe a multi package that adds dropbox, and other dependencies
> ?
> I do not care, I use only file and ssh backends but maybe it could be
> useful to someone else.
A flavour sounds like a good idea and I'll work on that in spare time but
don't let it hold this up.
Thanks,
Jason
