On 2011/12/13 11:51, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > Then this just leaves editors/cooledit. Diff below builds but not
> > really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64.
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/cooledit/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.37
> > diff -u -p -r1.37 Makefile
> > --- Makefile 2 Dec 2011 14:36:13 -0000 1.37
> > +++ Makefile 13 Dec 2011 13:45:40 -0000
> > @@ -1,12 +1,17 @@
> > # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.37 2011/12/02 14:36:13 espie Exp $
> >
> > +.include <bsd.port.arch.mk>
> > +.if ${PROPERTIES:Mlp64}
> > +BROKEN = crashes all over the place on LP64 arches, missing
> > prototypes
> > +.endif
> > +
> > COMMENT = easy to use, graphical editor
> >
> > CATEGORIES = editors
> > MASTER_SITES = ${HOMEPAGE}
> > -HOMEPAGE = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
> > +HOMEPAGE = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
> > DISTNAME = cooledit-3.17.14
>
> Looking at that website, its not updated in 6 years. Even if you patch
> to latest python 2/3 there are many other graphical text editor
> alternatives in the tree...
that's no reason to remove it per-se.
the majority of the fixes will be quite simple I just didn't have
time to look at them today (and actually they may be in 3.17.18
already).
