> Then this just leaves editors/cooledit. Diff below builds but not
> really tested as cooledit is currently a barrel of fail on amd64.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/cooledit/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.37
> diff -u -p -r1.37 Makefile
> --- Makefile 2 Dec 2011 14:36:13 -0000 1.37
> +++ Makefile 13 Dec 2011 13:45:40 -0000
> @@ -1,12 +1,17 @@
> # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.37 2011/12/02 14:36:13 espie Exp $
>
> +.include <bsd.port.arch.mk>
> +.if ${PROPERTIES:Mlp64}
> +BROKEN = crashes all over the place on LP64 arches, missing prototypes
> +.endif
> +
> COMMENT = easy to use, graphical editor
>
> CATEGORIES = editors
> MASTER_SITES = ${HOMEPAGE}
> -HOMEPAGE = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
> +HOMEPAGE = ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
> DISTNAME = cooledit-3.17.14
Looking at that website, its not updated in 6 years. Even if you patch
to latest python 2/3 there are many other graphical text editor
alternatives in the tree...
