> On 2010/02/22 14:33, Mark Lumsden wrote: >> Does anyone know if anything happened to these submissions for cacti? If >> they were progressed at all. > > It doesn't look like it. > >> http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archives/html/openbsd-ports/2006-10/msg00673.html > > The plugins should be separate ports imho. (We already have > php-weathermap which is also useful standalone). There are various > other problems with this port. I'll try and take a look at cleaning > it up sometime.. >
I hadn't seen that, will have a look. >> I use Cacti (www.cacti.net) and have recently compiled and started using >> Spine (www.cacti.net/spine_info.php) with it. Is anyone working on a >> spine-0.8.7e port? Otherwise, I can try and do it. > > I don't see much point in having spine before we have cacti. > I don't disagree with you, but should there not be a port of spine because there is no port of cacti, but cacti is easy to install manually...? How would you install cacti via a package, in a chrooted environment or not?
