On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:37:45AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024/12/16 19:07, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > If we want to ship some recent libbfd support, I think we should do it > > from devel/binutils. But right now nothing in the ports tree uses > > libbfd, so the easiest way forward is to just drop bfd from devel/gdb. > > I have verified that lang/rust still builds with this diff. > > > > I might also add fixes to the various devel/*/gcc ports at a later > > point, just in case we decide to install libbfd again. > > Agreed, this makes sense to me, thanks for tracking it down. > > > ok? > > OK.
Thank you folks, commited. > > @info info/bfd.info > > @info info/ctf-spec.info > > @@ -20,16 +9,6 @@ include/symcat.h > > @comment @info info/sframe-spec.info > > @info info/stabs.info > > It might make sense to @comment bfd.info as well. Indeed. I think it would also make sense to drop ctf-spec.info, which would be shipped by devel/binutils if we enabled libctf there. Like for libbfd, I see no reason to ship libctf-related files from devel/gdb. ok? Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/gdb/Makefile,v diff -u -p -r1.91 Makefile --- Makefile 18 Dec 2024 13:18:21 -0000 1.91 +++ Makefile 18 Dec 2024 13:24:31 -0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ COMMENT= GNU debugger CATEGORIES= devel DISTNAME= gdb-13.2 -REVISION= 4 +REVISION= 5 HOMEPAGE= https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/ Index: pkg/PLIST =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/gdb/pkg/PLIST,v diff -u -p -r1.27 PLIST --- pkg/PLIST 18 Dec 2024 13:18:21 -0000 1.27 +++ pkg/PLIST 18 Dec 2024 13:24:31 -0000 @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ bin/egdb-add-index include/gdb/ include/gdb/jit-reader.h @info info/annotate.info -@info info/bfd.info -@info info/ctf-spec.info +@comment @info info/bfd.info +@comment @info info/ctf-spec.info @info info/gdb.info @comment @info info/sframe-spec.info @info info/stabs.info -- jca
