On 2024/12/16 19:07, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > If we want to ship some recent libbfd support, I think we should do it > from devel/binutils. But right now nothing in the ports tree uses > libbfd, so the easiest way forward is to just drop bfd from devel/gdb. > I have verified that lang/rust still builds with this diff. > > I might also add fixes to the various devel/*/gcc ports at a later > point, just in case we decide to install libbfd again.
Agreed, this makes sense to me, thanks for tracking it down. > ok? OK. > @info info/bfd.info > @info info/ctf-spec.info > @@ -20,16 +9,6 @@ include/symcat.h > @comment @info info/sframe-spec.info > @info info/stabs.info It might make sense to @comment bfd.info as well.
