On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:21 PM Felix Palmen <fe...@palmen-it.de> wrote:
> * Gleb Popov <arr...@freebsd.org> [20211102 14:16]: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:34 PM Felix Palmen <fe...@palmen-it.de> wrote: > > > Very nice! What about special cases where some options combo (or just a > > > single one), maybe even depending on the target arch or FreeBSD > version, > > > would lead to some BROKEN/IGNORE? I see this could lead to an > incomplete > > > pkg-plist, but it might still be helpful for just testing? > > > > You can restart only failed builds after fixing them, see > > https://foss.heptapod.net/bsdutils/panopticum#restarting-failing-builds > > Well, BROKEN/IGNORE is used to fail fast for something known to be > broken, so I guess it should be treated differently? > Oh, you're right, I didn't think about it. Yes, this should be fixed in the Panopticum side. Mind creating an issue on the Gitlab?
