To summarize: this feature is now implemented and available in GitHub (will be part of 1.6.0 release) and has been tested working by Radu:
https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct/commit/dae6098d3dabb2627bf06827c2707d7e3c46c909 Many thanks Radu! Cheers, Paolo On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 09:43:28PM +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Thank you for your answer. > > For me it is not urgent as I am just starting with this, but it > would be really useful in the future. > > Best wishes, > > Radu > > > On 20.12.2015 15:57, Paolo Lucente wrote: > >Hi Radu, > > > >You are right: sequence number is not a natively supported primitive > >and, since it's part of the header and not of the flow record, it is > >not possible to leverage the aggregate_primitives framework either. > > > >This said, writing native support for the sequence number is not a > >super big deal; to help my prioritization, can you say how urgent/ > >important this is for you? Is anybody reading also interested into > >this? > > > >Cheers, > >Paolo > > > > > >On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>Is it possible to log NetFlow v9 sequence numbers with nfacctd? > >> > >>I don't think i can write a primitive for it as it is in the packet > >>header and it has no field_value. Am I wrong? > >> > >>This would be useful to detect when flows are lost. > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>Radu > > _______________________________________________ > pmacct-discussion mailing list > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists _______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
