Hi Radu, Perfect, thanks for confirming this. I think the new primitive is best introduced in the next release (rather than in the current one, 1.5.3), essentially in the Jan 2016 timeframe. I've put this work on my todo list - will come back to you once it's done.
Cheers, Paolo On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 09:43:28PM +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Thank you for your answer. > > For me it is not urgent as I am just starting with this, but it > would be really useful in the future. > > Best wishes, > > Radu > > > On 20.12.2015 15:57, Paolo Lucente wrote: > >Hi Radu, > > > >You are right: sequence number is not a natively supported primitive > >and, since it's part of the header and not of the flow record, it is > >not possible to leverage the aggregate_primitives framework either. > > > >This said, writing native support for the sequence number is not a > >super big deal; to help my prioritization, can you say how urgent/ > >important this is for you? Is anybody reading also interested into > >this? > > > >Cheers, > >Paolo > > > > > >On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 09:49:27PM +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>Is it possible to log NetFlow v9 sequence numbers with nfacctd? > >> > >>I don't think i can write a primitive for it as it is in the packet > >>header and it has no field_value. Am I wrong? > >> > >>This would be useful to detect when flows are lost. > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>Radu > > _______________________________________________ > pmacct-discussion mailing list > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists _______________________________________________ pmacct-discussion mailing list http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
