-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Hello Bruno,
> i've been able to verify the issue you've signalled taking the bare
> 'ports.lst.example'. It's an ugly bug that makes pmacct not deal very
> much with comments (the one on the second line, for example) only in
> the 'ports' file. Just deleting the second line makes it work without
> complains. The bug, however, was not causing any real functionality
> issue: in fact the remaining part of the file is loaded and parsed
> correctly. I've just fixed it, it will appear in next release.

Thank you Paolo, I will give that a try.

Cheers

/B

- --
Bruno Mattarollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems Administrator - Sydney
GnuPG: 65A6 C94A 1978 9B42 6ED2 FBCE 1BD2 756B 3A80 D8FC
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Rising Sun Pictures - [ http://www.rsp.com.au/ ]
redefining visual effects delivery
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
syd - ph +61 2 9338 6400 - fx +61 2 9338 6401
adl - ph +61 8 8400 6400 - fx +61 8 7421 6401
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
rising sun research - http://research.rsp.com.au
cineSpace color management solutions for film
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCVPKoG9J1azqA2PwRAqpHAJ93V5l+IJyjowh7H2gggVQfkVxrKQCaAzBp
emHP1Erjg4f6tqRg80Hdjug=
=fypV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to