Hehe.. thought you'll never notice =)
Ariz Jacinto wrote:
if those machines are still running services that are
vulnerable
then it wouldn't matter if it is joined or not. but if the domain
server is also serving as the antivir / security update repository
which can only be accessed via the domain, then those machines
are missing a lot.
this is off-topic. i thought you're asking if it is more secure to
use a FOSS alternative (which is a flamebait). :)
On 9/13/06,
John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What
do you think, guys? Is a non-domain-joined PC (but physically
connected) more secured?
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/447 - Release Date: 9/13/2006
--
Regards,
Jon C. Viardo, Jr.
MIS Manager
Tone Guide Press, Inc.
11 Tirad Pass St., Caloocan City
Philippines, 1400
Tel : +632-3646071 to 76
Fax : +632-364-7529
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
|
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph