On 3/20/06, fooler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on the hardware level... single dual core performs better than dual single > core assuming on the same frequency when it comes to cpu bound processing... > but dual single core has a better uptime than single dual core when a > physical cpu fails... furthermore, single dual core is more expensive than > dual single core as of the moment...
but PC hardware won't survive the loss of a CPU. can Linux on other architectures handle that? _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
