On Monday 20 March 2006 13:13, Miguel A Paraz wrote: > On 3/20/06, fooler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on the hardware level... single dual core performs better than dual > > single core assuming on the same frequency when it comes to cpu bound > > processing... but dual single core has a better uptime than single dual > > core when a physical cpu fails... furthermore, single dual core is more > > expensive than dual single core as of the moment... > > but PC hardware won't survive the loss of a CPU. > can Linux on other architectures handle that?
Don't rely on Linux for that at present (unless you're willing to go for an SGI or IBM mainframe). -- Paolo Alexis Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpYEzdWqVwk8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
