Now trying with a top post to see if it gets through. ;-) Yes changes are in place, but it does not hurt to publicly announce them. :-)
-ag -- pl. excuse brevity and possible typos, sent from a tiny device. On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Arun Khan <knu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:02 AM, wrote: > >> There are only two outcomes: >> 1. Change, so that mails can quickly get in and out >> 2. Do not change, status quo. > > I have already noticed changes in the filter policy; the last 2-3 day, > my posts are now getting through without the specter of the > "Suspicious Header" > > The "PLUG mailing list issues" is on the agenda for today's PLUG > meeting along with GNUnify 2013. I am not sure whether the quorum > will reach this item given GNUnify being first on the list. > >> It's as simple as that. But I am yet to hear from the owners about the >> option they select. Or are they still waiting for a vote and a >majority and >> the probably overrule because they are "head of family"? > > I humbly suggest to the chairperson to bring this topic on top. Much > of the pros/cons have already been discussed here. Thus the > discussion should not take more than 15-20 mins. summarizing the > changes in the mailing list policies and make it public with a post to > this mailing list. > > Thanks, > -- Arun Khan > > _______________________________________ > Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List _______________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
