On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:34 AM, ഓം <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM, BVK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:17 PM, ഓം <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> ... just like I would call >>> someone arguing on behalf of FSF as charged follower.. >>> >> >> As a 3rd party, i can see that they were talking about the license >> terms till now, its you who is brought this *on behalf of FSF* >> storyline into the picture. Do you really need to hate FSF that much? > > > So let them argue to their hearts content. Thanks for point out that > I need not contribute... >
OMG. What statement of my above paragraph really meant that, you need not contribute? >>> >>>> but I thought >>>> electrons need a *potential difference* to flow. They never cross the >>>> higher potential as far as I remember, they flow from a higher >>>> potential to a lower potential. >>> >>> everything is relatively easy to disprove... >> >> This is an assertion, please disprove! > > No need for me... you yourself can try to test it taking into account > any specific work... (including this one) > So basically, what you mean here is: 1. You can argue that some stuff XYZ is relatively easy. 2. When somebody asks how, you don't need to tell. Now i understand you (and why you call yourself a Guru). -- bvk-chaitanya -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
