Hi all,
This is in reference to a Ubuntu 5.10 'Breezy Badger' installation. I have a p 1.8 Ghz 128 168-pin 266 mhz DDR RAM but it takes more than 5 minutes from booting up to come to functional desktop. A. How can I shorten the time to boot up? I searched a little bit on the net & some of the things said are :-
   1. Disabling whatever services are not needed.
Looked at System > Services there are five services running & two of them have similar names a. anacron & cron now is there any differences between these two loggers & if yes, which is better for what? b. Similarly klogd & syslogd is there a difference between them? 2. It's told that OpenOffice has a prefix flag, which also takes memory can this be disabled or not? 3. There are supposed to be many devices, services which are in the kernel & one can re-compile the kernel to be small. Any good howto about this. I ran vmstat 5 10 just on the desktop as well after opening mahjong, the game the so (swap out I guess) didn't change much. It was 0 before & only showed couple of instances of some no. in so otherwise 0. So I guess memory is o.k. 4. I remember in XP I had to turn DMA on my hard disk to get good results while accessing the hard disc. How to check if DMA is on in Ubuntu? Maybe that could be the reason. Would be thankful for any help in this regard B. Has anybody made a local repository of Breezy Badger 5.10 what I'm interested is in bug-fixes & multimedia codecs & if possible any USB modules if they work? Somebody mentioned a USBnet module has anybody got this particular to work? If yes, from where to get it, installation & configuration instructions for it. Also any bug-fixes. As right now not able to work D-Link 502T with Linux the only option remaining is using XP to download stuff so instructions that way. I remember downloading rpm packages & just giving rpm -ivh filename & the file used to get installed. In Ubuntu dpkg does this the filename would be ending in *.deb or something else. I ask as there is supposed to be difference between deb for Ubuntu & for Debian Sarge. Is this true? If yes, then is there any way to know the difference between 2 deb files if one gets it from somewhere?

   C. The below is the result from the command df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda12            6.6G  1.5G  5.1G  23% /
tmpfs                  59M     0   59M   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 59M 13M 46M 22% /lib/modules/2.6.12-9-386/volatile
/dev/hda14            8.9G   37M  8.9G   1% /home
/dev/hda1             4.0G  3.8G  175M  96% /media/C
/dev/hda10            7.8G  6.0G  1.9G  76% /media/I
/dev/hda11            7.8G  6.4G  1.5G  82% /media/J
/dev/hda5             7.8G  5.9G  2.0G  75% /media/D
/dev/hda6             7.8G  7.1G  736M  91% /media/E
/dev/hda7             7.8G  5.9G  2.0G  75% /media/F
/dev/hda8             7.8G  6.5G  1.4G  83% /media/G
/dev/hda9             7.8G  6.5G  1.4G  84% /media/H
/dev/hdc              570M  570M     0 100% /media/cdrom0

the one which I'm interested is in /dev/hda 14 of /home where 37 MB is supposed to be used by /home when I looked at the contents from /home it showed me no. of items & all close to 5 MB where is all the rest going, Mind u that in Nautilus I had given to show all the hidden files. Is something still being hidden or Nautilus is showing some wrong info or is there something else. I had sometime back had 5.04's /home in the same drive with a different username. After chmod as sudo was able to delete that folder & from 47 it now shows 37. This is when I was using the old system for around 2 months. Can somebody guide me on this? Thanx in advance.
--
                          Shirish Agarwal
                         Life is a dream Enjoy it!
                         Creative Commons, Attribution
Non-commercial, non-derivative

--
______________________________________________________________________
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:      (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List Information:  http://plug.org.in/mailing-list/listinfo/plug-mail
Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.

Reply via email to