Oops, I guess I should have read the whole thread before replying. I could have saved myself a bunch of typing.

Brian Cluff

On 01/11/2016 10:14 AM, Stephen Partington wrote:
Cameras are usually good for 50000-300000 actuations if not more (Ie mirrorless cameras)

But the issue with using software to do the over/under expose of the image you loose the on site expanded dynamic range. Newer cameras can have some crazy dynamic range, but if you have an older camera or one that just doesn't have it Multiple exposures is about the only way to really get the data you need. and ideally you are doing this to expand you baseline, and extremes parts of the exposure.

Doing this in software from the same image, even is you do have a raw image to work with you are still imited to +/- 5-7Ev in most cases. I think sony can push as far as 11 to 14 but i would need to check my sources.

With set of images for HDR you move your EV to + and - 3-5 that then gives you a huge dynamic range to get details out of the brights and shadows.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Michael Havens <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I was wondering... would using software to over/under expose an
    image be the same as taking 3 images which have been physically
    altered? Less wear and tear on the camera is good!

    Also, I was watching a tutorial on luminance hdr and in his
    version the software had a bunch of variation of an hdr which
    could be modified. My version doesn't seem to have that. Is there
    a setting?

    On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Brian Cluff <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Use LuminanceHDR for exposure blending.  GIMP is waaaaaay too
much work to get just one way to blending the images. Luminance on the other hard offers a tons of different methods
        and then you can tweak the settings within each method.  It's
        all very easy and gives you much better results.

        Brian Cluff

        On 01/07/2016 05:51 PM, Michael Havens wrote:

            thank you so much man. I really appreciate it. I
            certaainly will devote
            10% of my available   brain to these videos tomorrow. Do
            you know of any
            videos or text teaching how to do exposure blending with
            gimp2.8? all
            the tuts  I've been finding are incomplete or are how to
            do it with 2.2!

            On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Brian Cluff
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

                There's a ton of ways to do what you want.  The
            biggest thing you
                will have to worry about is lighting. For instance, if
            you are
                putting something that was lit from the left into a
            scene that was
                lit from the right, then there is little you can do.
            No matter how
                carefully you add it to your scene your brain will
            always tell you
                there is something wrong with the picture.

                I tend to use a couple of different techniques to put
            one image into
                another.
                If the background is a relatively solid color, I'll
            use a technique
                similar to this example for cutting out images while
            preserving fine
                details (hair in this example)... hint, you don't use
            ANY of the
                selection tools, or copy and past.
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnbxtMCHKV0
                or
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jle81ofRLok
                or
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quAChCnK_Dk

                The other way I like combine image is brushing out the
            background
                using layer masks as demonstrated in this video with
            the leg:
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHJAJziWDs0

                I usually use a combination of the 2 techniques since
            you rarely get
                perfect results with either method.

                All these methods ultimately use layer masks, which is
            a much better
                way to combine photos than cutting and pasting since
            you can tweak
                what is transparent or not back and both without
            having to commit to
                a certain part of an image like you do with cutting
            and pasting.

                Brian Cluff


                On 01/07/2016 02:58 PM, Michael Havens wrote:

                    I found a way to super impose an image but it
                looks tacky.
                    The method I learned was to open both files and
                then to select the
                    image you want to put on the other with fuzzytool.
                I found that
                    didn't work so I used the path tool. Well I cut
                the image out but
                    the paste doesn't look good. It is out of scale.
                For the purposes
                    I need WHat ithe best way to cut a house out and
                put it on a blue sky?

                    --
                    :-)~MIKE~(-:


                ---------------------------------------------------
                    PLUG-discuss mailing list
                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                    <mailto:[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>>
                    To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail
                settings:
                http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



            ---------------------------------------------------
                PLUG-discuss mailing list -
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
                To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail
            settings:
            http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




            --
            :-)~MIKE~(-:


            ---------------------------------------------------
            PLUG-discuss mailing list -
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
            http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

        ---------------------------------------------------
        PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
        http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




-- :-)~MIKE~(-:

    ---------------------------------------------------
    PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
    http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss




--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.

Stephen



---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to