On 30 November 2016 at 17:30, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Should we assign this to openafs? Is there something which needs to be
> > done on the systemd side, and if so, further information and help would
> > be welcome.
>
> I don't suppose there's any way to get systemd --user to open a PAM
> session on behalf of the user before starting to run programs?  That would
> probably solve the problem (although there may still be some complications
> in making sure it has correct visibility to the Kerberos ticket cache).

systemd --user does open a pam session (with the systemd-user name).
Maybe the problem is that libpam-afs-session (is this the right
module?) registers itself in the common-session include file but
systemd-user loads only common-session-noninteractive ?


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

_______________________________________________
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers

Reply via email to