On 05/08/10 at 17:14 +0200, vincent carmona wrote: > 2010/8/5 Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>: > > On 05/08/10 at 16:26 +0200, vincent carmona wrote: > >> 2010/8/5 Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>: > >> >> libglobalhotkeys-ruby seems more understandable than librghk-ruby. > >> > > >> > That's a problem that you should probably address as the upstream author > >> > ;) > >> > >> I think I will change the require call for require 'globalhotkeys' in > >> the next upstream release. Can I stay with libglobalhotkeys-ruby for > >> now ? > > > > If you are sure that you will do it, then yes. > > I will. > > >> >> As for doc-base, the package does not install "online" documentation, > >> >> only the rdoc html file and a ruby example. Should I use doc-base ? > >> > > >> > Yes, I think so. > >> > >> I gonna take a look at at a project that use doc-base. > > > > Isn't it used by other pkg-ruby-extras packages? > > It seems that is use by 13 pkg-ruby-extras projects. > After taking a look at one I have update svn repo with a doc-base > file. I hope I do it the right way. > > The last problems I see in the package are shlibdeps warnings at building > time : > dh_shlibdeps -plibglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8 > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libdl.so.2 could be avoided if > "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libm.so.6 could be avoided if > "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librt.so.1 could be avoided if > "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be > avoided if > "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcrypt.so.1 could be avoided > if "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > > I think it is due to the extconf.rb magic. Should I get rid off these > warnings ? How ?
No, please ignore them for now. All ruby-extras packages have the same problem. So, should I sponsor your package, or do you have other TODO items? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
