Hi again, Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 05:12 +0200 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker: > => 0xb76df6c9 <init_xrpow_core_sse+105>: movaps %xmm0,0x20(%esp) > > Yes, this "movaps" seems to be a SSE instruction. > Also the changes in the previous patch "should" not change the instructions > but only the alignment of the memory the instructions operate on. > And if that is the case, with proper alignment it is working. > But probably there is a better way to convince gcc to align the memory ...
so, we have a suspect here, but not really a culprit yet. The main difference between the packages in wheezy and jessie is that the former is not built with SSE instructions at all. So, it seems that we have not intriduced a bug, but merely uncovered a bug that was well hidden before, because the code path in question was never enabled. The problem is that I am rather illiterate with regard to SSE code, to me the code looks "all fine". I am thus inclined to disable SSE instructions again in the lame package. This may be ugly but serves as a work-around in unstable. But I don't think that such drastic measure is the most reasonable thing to do to the package in stable. So, I'd really appreciate if someone with more insight into SSE code could have a deeper look at it and try to figure out why the code fails on jessie i386. - Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
