Dear All, 2015-04-29 20:56 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org>: > > 'Evening Ladies and Gentlemen, > > I am afraid that I have to revive this discussion once again now that > Jessie is out as we have plenty of time before starting doing any > major work for Stretch: it's really the right time to make a final > decision about this subject. > The need to get this dichotomy solved may be found in Moritz's last email: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > > To properly migrate over a daemon they need to co-exist for a stable > > release, while a lib does not. Stretch will only have one of them. > > [snip] > > > Having both for a year along each other will only waste people's time. Now > > at the beginning of the release cycle is the time to make a decision, > > not by dragging things into a year as of today. Picking one of the two > > won't be any simpler in 12 months. > > It appears clear to me that the security team wouldn't be too happy to > support both FFmpeg and libav: > Therefore the question still remains: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> wrote: > > So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a > > consensus on this topic? Please cast your vote before Friday noon (8th May) with a brief explanation if you would like to participate in the decision.
Cheers, Balint _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
