'Evening Ladies and Gentlemen, I am afraid that I have to revive this discussion once again now that Jessie is out as we have plenty of time before starting doing any major work for Stretch: it's really the right time to make a final decision about this subject. The need to get this dichotomy solved may be found in Moritz's last email:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > To properly migrate over a daemon they need to co-exist for a stable > release, while a lib does not. Stretch will only have one of them. [snip] > Having both for a year along each other will only waste people's time. Now > at the beginning of the release cycle is the time to make a decision, > not by dragging things into a year as of today. Picking one of the two > won't be any simpler in 12 months. It appears clear to me that the security team wouldn't be too happy to support both FFmpeg and libav: Therefore the question still remains: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> wrote: > So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a > consensus on this topic? Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
