On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 18:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 15:01 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>>>>>>> <h...@at.or.at> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified >>>>>>>>> version of >>>>>>>>> the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. >>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>> is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of >>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>> ITP'ed packages depend on it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese >>>>>>>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you >>>>>>>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some >>>>>>>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" >>>>>>> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is >>>>>>> included >>>>>>> in Debian: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more >>>>>>> verbose in >>>>>>> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can >>>>> generate the appropriate tarball. >>>> >>>> Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They >>>> should be up there now. >>> >>> The changelog was not correctly dated. In order to avoid even more >>> delays I updated it myself. >>> Uploaded. >> >> Sorry for my continuing lameness on that timestamp. Once I make updates >> to these packages, it'll become part of the natural flow since dch is >> the easiest way to update the changelog. >> >> Thanks for uploading, time to dig up a couple more! :-D >> >> .hc > > Hey Felipe, > > It seems that there was something wrong with the pd-ggee upload, its > complaining about NMU stuff. I'm guessing this is because the changelog has > your name/email at the bottom: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/pd-ggee_0.26-1.html#source-lintian > > W: pd-ggee source: changelog-should-mention-nmu > W: pd-ggee source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.26-1
Yes, I know. It is not important, though. Next upload should have your name on it (or my name added to Uploaders, depending on how the thing goes). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
