On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:11 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > >> > >> On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> pd-ggee is a short-form dh package that is a lightly modified version of > >>>> the standard Makefile. pd-ggee in on git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It > >>>> is a library without depends that are new packages but a couple of other > >>>> ITP'ed packages depend on it. > >>>> > >>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-ggee.git;a=summary > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'm not quite comfortable with the license, and I am no legalese > >>> person so I try to stick to standard-licensed software... Could you > >>> please run this license through the debian-legal list to get some > >>> input on it? My concern is specifically about the last paragraph. > >> > >> > >> Yeah, the license is a bit weird, I don't know what its "officially" > >> called, but it is the same text as the [incr Tcl] license, which is > >> included > >> in Debian: > >> > >> > >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/i/itcl3/itcl3_3.4~b1-2/itcl3.copyright > >> > >> The only difference is that the GOVERNMENT USE section is more verbose in > >> the itcl license, but they reference the same regulation numbers. > > > > > > It seems to be the Tcl/Tk license: > > > > http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/license.html > > Indeed. Please add the pristine-tar data to the repository, so I can > generate the appropriate tarball.
Oops, sorry, I forgot to push the tags and branches I suppose. They should be up there now. .hc _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
