On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for >>>>> this. If you want to change it, go ahead. >>>> >>>> I'll change it, just to make sure... >>> >>> If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a >>> svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~, >>> and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean >>> changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1 >> >> this looks wrong to me. >> >> what's the problem with 4:0.6~? > > That you intended to restrict the dependencies to the first upstream > 0.6 released package, but you actually loosened to any previous svn > checkout of the 0.6 branch.
oh, I see. Indeed. In that case, Fabian is right with 4:0.6-1~ This of course looses against 4:0.6-0ubuntu1, but that's hardly a problem that we need to consider here anyway. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
