On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: >> Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it >> tightening by some other aspect than technical? > > It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which points to a > date a few weeks before the release, from the version number you > actually get "closer" to the release.
yes > Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it. I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for this. If you want to change it, go ahead. > BTW, I've got to other questions: > > - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev > depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg? uploading rtmpdump now sounds good, reuploading ffmpeg doesn't seem important enough to me. > - What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean? I was playing with gbp-pq import and gbp-pq export, and it seems to enforce it's own scheme of naming patches. Unfortunatly, it doesn't seem to work out too well for me so far :-( -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
