On 10/7/19 2:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I recently ran into a problem with jackd1 not being compatible with some
> other software (mixxx).

what do you mean with "not being compatible"?

in any case, it sounds like a bug in either mixxx, libportaudio or jackd1.



> Checking the rdepends on jackd1, it seems like nothing other than jack
> packages depend on it, so wondering if it should be removed.

also nothing depends on jackd2 (or nothing but other jack packages
should depend directly on it). so should we retire it as well?

the current policy is that the user can chose to install either jackd1
OR jackd2, whatever fits their needs.

gmdsar
IOhannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to