El jueves, 16 de febrero de 2023 13:42:42 -03 Soren Stoutner escribió: > Seeing as this is how Qt WebEngine is designed upstream, I think it is > important to support it in Debian. From my personal perspective, the > program I am developing (Privacy Browser) depends on Qt WebEngine and needs > spell checking functionality to be viable in Debian. > > I have been working with the Qt 5 and 6 WebEngine code base recently and > have submitted patches both to Debian and upstream. My goal is to make the > WebEngine packages Lintian free, which is going to require a bit of work, > but I am in it for the long haul. I am also willing to become the > maintainer of the WebEngine packages or to co-maintain them with others.
I'm totally in for this, but then I need to see proves before continue exposing internal stuff to third parties. It's very much the same issue with private headers. I would definitely do not mind to expose this if the Qt project compiles the bdic files as part of their build process *and* it's part of their CI testing. > While I agree that the entire design of the .bdic binary dictionaries is > suboptimal, I think that appropriately supporting them in Debian is the best > way forward. Believe me I try to do the same, but web engines already made me waste too much time, so I try to avoid whatever could bring us yet another headache. A simple error can easily cost a couple of hours.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
