El sáb, 4 feb 2023 a las 20:20, Rene Engelhard (<r...@debian.org>) escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 04.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> > Seeing as how .bdic files are not exclusive to Qt, qt-convert-dict is 
> > probably
> > not the most accurate name, but bdic-convert-dict would make sense.  Another
> > option would be to name it convert-bdic.  The Chromium upstream names the 
> > tool
> > convert_dict, but we aren’t beholden to follow their lead.
> >
> > I have updated the merge request to name the tool /usr/bin/convert-bdic,  
> > and
> > the virtual package to be convert-bdic, but can change it again if there is 
> > a
> > consensus in a different direction.
>
> convert-bdic is fine with me,  thanks :)

Also fine with me, thanks.

One question. Will old packages keep shipping conversion tool using
old name and location for a while? We would otherwise need to rebuild
dicts to use new dependency and avoid FTBFS. Once it is clear that
/usr/bin/convert-bdic is the new path I will add it as preferred path.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin

-- 
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Reply via email to