El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 16:20:29 -03 Sam James escribió: > > On 2 Feb 2023, at 19:01, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote:> > > El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:54:44 -03 Helge Deller escribió: > >> On 2/2/23 19:21, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > >>> El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:08:49 -03 Sam James escribió: > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>>>> Pruning whatever code they do not test on the CI and does not has > >>>>> active > >>>>> users, no matter how short/long it can be. > >>>> > >>>> At > >>>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qbs/qbs/+/437296/comments/9b34cbab_ > >>>> 87 > >>>> ce > >>>> d2e4, someone suggested adding cross HPPA (and maybe others) to their > >>>> Docker setup. That could be a start. > >>> > >>> I'm quite in contact with the CI staff. I sincerely don't think they > >>> will > >>> want to add yet another CI image except they have a big client requiring > >>> it :-/ > >> > >> I think this will only be debian, and gentoo - both distributions support > >> hppa. > >> > >>> I'll bring it up next week, but I will not have high expectations on > >>> this. > >> > >> Btw, I did noticed that the hppa build on debian failed, but was too busy > >> with other things to look into it. And, I was hoping someone would fix it > >> as it seemed trivial. > >> Beside the CI, we have two debian porterboxes for hppa, so testing is > >> possible. > > > > Well, that's already a bad signal :-/ It means there are no real users for > > it (yet?), else you would be seeing complaints :-( > > Someone in #gentoo-hppa a few days ago got a KDE Plasma desktop running, > believe it or not ;) > > As for Debian: I guess Helge means "new build fails", not "the package isn't > available".
Sorry, I also took that in the wrong direction. > Debian users do not build from source usually, so they wouldn't notice a > problem. Of course.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk