> On 2 Feb 2023, at 17:44, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Paul! > > El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 14:35:40 -03 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > escribió: >> Hi Lisandro! >> >> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 13:48 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: >>> Upstream has just required us for a proof that Qt 6 is being in use in >>> your >>> ports: >>> >>> <https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/437349/comments/ >>> cb357b65_46e7edcd> >>> >>> If the outcome is "not working" or "not really being in use" they will >>> probably remove support from upstream's source code. >>> >>> What is the current status of Qt 6 in your ports? Can you supply an image >>> of Qt 6 working on them? >> >> I'm not sure what they consider »support«, there are some pre-processor >> definitions in the code which hardly can be considered a maintenance >> burden. Or are they going to start adding large chunks of >> architecture-specific code? Not sure I understand the motivation behind the >> question. > > Pruning whatever code they do not test on the CI and does not has active > users, no matter how short/long it can be.
At https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qbs/qbs/+/437296/comments/9b34cbab_87ced2e4, someone suggested adding cross HPPA (and maybe others) to their Docker setup. That could be a start.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
