Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:49:29 -0600
with message-id <6279639.KnTsUJFDXb@riemann>
and subject line Re: Bug#585456: [digikam] please don't depend on marble-data
has caused the Debian Bug report #585456,
regarding [digikam] please don't depend on marble-data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
585456: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: digikam
Version: 2:1.2.0-2
Severity: wishlist
digikam depends on marble-data through a Depends on libmarblewidget.
marble is used for geolocation, which is not used by most people:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/README?view=markup&sortby=date
marble-data is 21 MB and a 12 MB download. libmarblewidget is 2 MB.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
To the original submitter: I understand and respect your request to pare down
dependencies. Unfortunately, I simply do not have the resources to do this --
and check that nothing breaks. So I think, after 10 years, it is best to just
admit that this request is not going to be fulfilled. At least not without
help.
The current state, as Agustin notes, is that "marble-data" is no longer
depended on. But I think that's only because the files in question now live in
"marble-qt-data", which is a hard dependency via the library package
libmarblewidget-qt5. So, I will close this even though I recognize the spirit
of your request has not been fulfilled.
Best,
-Steve
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:00:04 +0100 Agustin Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:32:03AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > On 2013-12-16 08:44, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > > On my not-so-bare KDE install, installing Digikam (without disabling
recommends) caused a 71 MB download and required 231 MB more of storage.
> >
> > With 4.0.0, I'm now getting 73 MB / 254 MB...
> >
> > By the way, #542951 also requests reducing dependencies.
>
> Hi,
>
> Triaging some old digikam bug reports. marble-data seems no longer required
> in current sid (4:6.4.0+dfsg-3).
>
> sid# apt install digikam
> digikam is already the newest version (4:6.4.0+dfsg-3)
> sid# apt purge marble-data
> The following packages will be REMOVED: marble-data*
> Removing marble-data (4:19.12.0-1) ...
> sid# apt install digikam
> digikam is already the newest version (4:6.4.0+dfsg-3).
>
> Can this bug report be closed?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Agustin
>
>
&references=<[email protected]>
<1726187.F7NAMY1Kh7@acer>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
