On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:32 AM Nilesh Patra <nil...@riseup.net> wrote: >> >>> On 3/15/22 5:21 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>> > i've setup a specific salsa ci pipeline for this: >>> > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/358409 < >>> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/358409> >>> > >>> > As you can see, it has jobs for rebuilding reverse build-depends. >>> > It is not meant to be triggered continuously (because it consumes a >>> lot of resources), >>> > one has to trigger it by hand, which I have done just before. >>> > >>> > I'd extend the list of jobs to the list of 1677 source packages >>> build-depending on nodejs, but >>> > it might consume too much time and space on salsa-ci... >>> > [...] >>> >>> This is cool, but >>> Please consider asking salsa CI admins if it is okay to trigger builds >>> for large volumes of reverse dependencies. >>> Several months back (IIRC) something similar happened in the ruby-team >>> and the runners choked because of that >>> and even salsa went down :) >>> >> >> Yes, >> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/291 >> >> I'm waiting for an answer. >> I only tried the rebuild of ~30 reverse build-deps of libnode-dev for now. >> > > The answer from the salsa admin is no. > I'll do the minimal solution, then: fix libnode-dev reverse build-deps, > and let other breakage happen in unstable. > That is, unless someone knows where I can get a spare salsa ci runner. Jérémy >
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
