On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:42 AM Jérémy Lal <kapo...@melix.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:32 AM Nilesh Patra <nil...@riseup.net> wrote: > >> On 3/15/22 5:21 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > i've setup a specific salsa ci pipeline for this: >> > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/358409 < >> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/nodejs/-/pipelines/358409> >> > >> > As you can see, it has jobs for rebuilding reverse build-depends. >> > It is not meant to be triggered continuously (because it consumes a lot >> of resources), >> > one has to trigger it by hand, which I have done just before. >> > >> > I'd extend the list of jobs to the list of 1677 source packages >> build-depending on nodejs, but >> > it might consume too much time and space on salsa-ci... >> > [...] >> >> This is cool, but >> Please consider asking salsa CI admins if it is okay to trigger builds >> for large volumes of reverse dependencies. >> Several months back (IIRC) something similar happened in the ruby-team >> and the runners choked because of that >> and even salsa went down :) >> > > Yes, > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/291 > > I'm waiting for an answer. > I only tried the rebuild of ~30 reverse build-deps of libnode-dev for now. > The answer from the salsa admin is no. I'll do the minimal solution, then: fix libnode-dev reverse build-deps, and let other breakage happen in unstable. Jérémy
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
