Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-08 10:04:13) > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 09:44:00) > > what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle > > (<< 2.26.3+repack~)" ? Jest version in unstable is > > "26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-1" > > 7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1 is higher than 2.26.3+repack~ > > ...because 3.2 is higher than 3+ > > ...because + means "just above" so beats only nothing or 0.
Please ignore above - totally crazy of me to compare _node-cosmiconfig_ version with Breaks value of jest. As Andreas posted a moment ago, problem is that the jest version of 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.28.30-1 is lower than 2.26.3+repack~. Seem you forgot to include the +ds suffix, i.e. this should work: Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+ds+repack~), node-jest-debbundle (<< 2.26.3+ds+repack~) On a related note, I can recommend to generally use suffix ~ds or ~dfsg for repackaging, to leave room eventually dropping it later it turns out to be unneeded. If ~ds were used for jest then forgetting to include the suffix in Breaks would work, but that is just accidental: Correct is to always include whatever suffix is on the original package version and then at the end of _full_ version add ~ to cover custom extensions like ~bpo. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
