Le 08/12/2020 à 10:04, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Xavier (2020-12-08 09:44:00) >> Le 08/12/2020 à 09:37, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : >>> Package: node-cosmiconfig >>> Version: 7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1 >>> Severity: serious >>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org >>> Usertags: piuparts >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from >>> 'testing'. >>> It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails >>> because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a >>> Breaks+Replaces relation. >>> >>> See policy 7.6 at >>> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces >>> >>> From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): >>> >>> Preparing to unpack .../node-cosmiconfig_7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1_all.deb ... >>> Unpacking node-cosmiconfig (7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1) ... >>> dpkg: error processing archive >>> /var/cache/apt/archives/node-cosmiconfig_7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1_all.deb >>> (--unpack): >>> trying to overwrite '/usr/share/nodejs/callsites/index.d.ts', which is >>> also in package jest 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.28.30-1 >>> Errors were encountered while processing: >>> /var/cache/apt/archives/node-cosmiconfig_7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1_all.deb >>> >>> There is currently >>> >>> Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle (<< 2.26.3+repack~) >>> >>> which looks like a typoed version (2 times?), while the corresponding >>> changelog entry has the correct version. >>> But you also need matching Replaces to properly move files between packages >>> (the Breaks alone could also be satisfied by simply deconfiguring jest). >> >> Hi, >> >> what is wrong in "Breaks: jest (<< 2.26.3+repack~), node-jest-debbundle >> (<< 2.26.3+repack~)" ? Jest version in unstable is >> "26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-1" > > 7.0.0+~cs8.3.2-1 is higher than 2.26.3+repack~ > > ...because 3.2 is higher than 3+ > > ...because + means "just above" so beats only nothing or 0.
But 26.6.3+ds+~cs64.28.30-1 (testing) is lower than 2.26.3+repack~, so this "Breaks" looks good, isn't it ? Anyway I don't understand how to fix this -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
