Quoting Scott Kitterman (2020-06-18 23:44:43) > On Thursday, June 18, 2020 4:57:52 PM EDT Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 1:40:09 AM IST, Bastian Blank > > <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > >The introduces an unnecessary split into katex and libjs-katex. > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 > > > > * User-facing executable programs associated with a library should usually > > be packaged in a non-library binary package whose name reflects the program > > (for example tappy, flatpak, parted) or collection of related programs (for > > example kmod, libsecret-tools, libglib2.0-bin), rather than being bundled > > in the same binary package as the runtime library. > > > > Do you disagree with recommendation of ctte or you don't think it does not > > apply here? > > You did read the rest of that, right?
Hi Scott and Bastian and others in the ftpmaster team, I read above quote as an attempt at saying "hmm, I don't see the split as necessary, and to me it feels like the tech-ctte team agrees that _generally_ such split is sensible. Could you please elaborate a bit on your opinion that the introduced split into katex and libjs-katex is unnecessary? Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
-- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
