On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 1:40:09 AM IST, Bastian Blank <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > >The introduces an unnecessary split into katex and libjs-katex.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 * User-facing executable programs associated with a library should usually be packaged in a non-library binary package whose name reflects the program (for example tappy, flatpak, parted) or collection of related programs (for example kmod, libsecret-tools, libglib2.0-bin), rather than being bundled in the same binary package as the runtime library. Do you disagree with recommendation of ctte or you don't think it does not apply here? > > >=== > >Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >concerns. > > >-- >Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list >Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net >https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
