On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> I'd like to hear Johans opinion on SAGA support in QGIS. > > Not updating SAGA to newer upstream releases when we have a working > QGIS/SAGA combination is not a very appealing option. It does seem to me > the best way to have a working combination in stable without the need > for additional repositories (backports or 3rd party). > > If the SAGA developers were to adopt LTS releases, this would greatly > getting those versions supported in QGIS. We can then target those > releases for inclusion in stable. > > In the mean time there is not much we as distribution maintainers can do > about this issue, unless we stop keeping SAGA current to allow QGIS to > catch up or actively port the SAGA Processing support in QGIS for every > new SAGA release. > > @Johan, what can you tell us about this issue from the SAGA point of view? > I agree with the QGIS devs. The changing parameters are also a problem for those just writing their own saga scripts. I will raise the issue again on the mailinglist. Kind Regards, Johan _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
