Your message dated Mon, 27 Apr 2026 05:53:38 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev,
libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1135006,
regarding gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev
and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1135006: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1135006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and
libogdi-dev which are not in unstable
Package: gis-devel
Version: 0.0.22
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer(s),
I noticed that package gis-devel recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev,
libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev, which are currently not available in
unstable.
See:
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcitygml-dev : dropped from testing
on 2025-09-10
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libemos-dev : removed from testing
(2026-02-02, perhaps will re-appear?)
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libhdf4-alt-dev : the source package
libhdf4 does not generate any binary named libhdf4-alt-dev . Perhaps
it used to do it time ago? or libhdf4-dev is the one to recommend
now?
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libogdi-dev : removed from testing on
2025-09-08
Would it make sense to remove or update them?
Thank you for your time,
PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues:
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are
manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive
such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages,
etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well.
PS[1]: more information available in
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md
and
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-report-extra-info.md
--
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat | [email protected] | [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 4/26/26 10:54 PM, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
I noticed that package gis-devel recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev,
libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev, which are currently not available in
unstable.
This is expected for blends tasks, those only get uploaded shortly before the
freeze.
Packages get added and removed in git during the development cycle.
Please don't bother filing these bugreports without patches to the current
state of git.
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcitygml-dev : dropped from testing
on 2025-09-10
Removed 7 months ago:
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/gis/-/commit/a772c81e677fcae4cbde0be6aae6d0cb1e9cc656
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libemos-dev : removed from testing
(2026-02-02, perhaps will re-appear?)
Not our package, removed now.
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libhdf4-alt-dev : the source package
libhdf4 does not generate any binary named libhdf4-alt-dev . Perhaps
it used to do it time ago? or libhdf4-dev is the one to recommend
now?
Removed 4 months ago:
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/gis/-/commit/72ed8dbfae11d9811ad9b8409559fdb07bdf6971
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libogdi-dev : removed from testing on
2025-09-08
Removed 8 months ago:
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/gis/-/commit/6965544e016a07ffd472879077b67cc60dae2c6c
Thank you for your time,
Please stop wasting both your own and hours, send patches if you want to
improve the blends tasks.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
PGP Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
