Subject: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable Package: gis-devel Version: 0.0.22 Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends Severity: wishlist
Dear maintainer(s), I noticed that package gis-devel recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev, which are currently not available in unstable. See: - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcitygml-dev : dropped from testing on 2025-09-10 - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libemos-dev : removed from testing (2026-02-02, perhaps will re-appear?) - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libhdf4-alt-dev : the source package libhdf4 does not generate any binary named libhdf4-alt-dev . Perhaps it used to do it time ago? or libhdf4-dev is the one to recommend now? - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libogdi-dev : removed from testing on 2025-09-08 Would it make sense to remove or update them? Thank you for your time, PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues: https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages, etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well. PS[1]: more information available in https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md and https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-report-extra-info.md -- Carles Pina i Estany https://carles.pina.cat | [email protected] | [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
